LISA RENEE: “Circular Debate”

“We live during a time where there is a weaponization of narratives, and no one is immune to this type of false information targeting. To weaponize a narrative is to gain control over how people think, what they believe to be true, and to control their perception in the process of delivering them disinformation that is designed to weaken them and weaken their defenses. Why do the Controllers want you weakened? Reflect on that. What really weakens you emotionally and mentally, and your ability to discern the truth and make informed decisions for yourself that empower and support your spiritual strength, that which is needed to actualize your purpose in the world? The number one weakening tactic used by those leaders controlled by Thothian hijack that generate Propaganda is to get you to believe a lie as a truth. If you believe lies you are being told your perception, your beliefs and your behaviors will be fully controlled, your spiritual guidance will be distorted, you’ll think north is south and south is east, and this keeps you lost in the sea of confusion. Lies confuse your inner compass, you will not know what direction you are traveling. That is what it means to weaponize narratives, believing in lies weakens people, you cannot know what direction you are travelling if your Spiritual Guidance System is messed up and you are moving in the wrong direction and are not aware that you need course correction. This is an important part of Psychological Warfare, and mostly it is designed to confuse people into webs of disinformation and then get people to spread the disinformation as facts or made into a belief system.”

~Lisa Renee, Weaponizing Narratives


Above: Donald Trump, Joe Biden and Hillary Clinton show their ‘666’ allegiance to the Cabal. They are all puppet-actors playing their assigned roles for the same NAA handler-controllers.

Circular debate: An argument that goes nowhere. Though a person believes he or she is arguing a point, the argument does not progress because the individual has an fixed and immovable belief that is considered to be a fact and this is the core point of the argument, which in their belief system, is actually not debatable. The Negative Ego tends to exert Mental Rigidity which fixates on polarizing belief systems on right and wrong, black and white, Splitting behaviors that compartmentalize thinking into Circular Reasoning and Linear Thinking.

The following terms describe an assortment of Logical Fallacies that are commonly used as Ego Defense Mechanisms in order to divert attention away from flawed arguments that favor one’s desired personal position or supports their beliefs of self-justification during conflicts.

What Is a Logical Fallacy?

Logical fallacies are flawed, deceptive, or false arguments that can be proven wrong with reasoning. There are two main types of fallacies:

  • A formal fallacy is an argument with a premise and conclusion that doesn’t hold up to scrutiny.
  • An informal fallacy is an error in the form, content, or context of the argument.[1]

Circular Reasoning

Circular reasoning is when you attempt to make an argument by beginning with an assumption that what you are trying to prove is already true. In your premise, you already accept the truth of the claim you are attempting to make. It sounds complicated, but it is easily understood with some real-world examples.

Circular reasoning may sound convincing, but consider who will most likely be convinced by a circular argument. Those who already accept the argument as true are more likely to be further convinced. This is because they already believe the assumption that is stated.

Examples of Circular Reasoning:

  • The Bible is true, so you should not doubt the Word of God.

This argument rests on your prior acceptance of the Bible as truth. Therefore in the belief system and mind of this person, this is a fact that is not debatable.

Straw Man

A fallacy is an argument or belief based on erroneous reasoning, usually designed to attack or gaslight an opponent. Straw man is one type of logical fallacy. Straw man occurs when someone argues that a person holds a view that is actually not what the other person believes. Instead, it is a distorted version of what the person believes. So, instead of attacking the person’s actual statement or belief, it is the distorted version that is attacked, when the targeted person never made the statement to begin with. The basic assumption is that if one small part of an argument can be proved false then, by association, the whole argument is also false. A weak argument is one made of straw that is easily knocked over. Hence the term straw man. [2]

Red Herring

Red herring is a kind of fallacy that is an irrelevant topic introduced in an argument to divert the attention of listeners or readers from the original issue. In literature, this fallacy is often used in detective or suspense novels to mislead readers or characters, or to induce them to make false conclusions.

Manipulators use red herrings to lay a false trail that leads people away from areas that you do not want them to see. To do this, the trail must be of sufficient interest that the other person misses any clues to other areas. Red herrings are particularly useful when the activity is time-bound. Time spent following the red herring is time that can not be spent looking in other areas. Talking about problems that are not really problems has effects beyond distraction. [3]

Fallacy

A fallacy is the use of invalid or otherwise faulty reasoning, or “wrong moves” in the construction of an argument. A fallacious argument may be deceptive by appearing to be better than it really is. Some fallacies are committed intentionally to manipulate or persuade by deception, while others are committed unintentionally due to carelessness or ignorance. The soundness of legal arguments depends on the context in which the arguments are made. [4]

Non Sequitur

A non sequitur (Classical Latin: “it does not follow”) is a conversational literary device, often used for comedic purposes or to confuse the audience. It is something said that, because of its apparent lack of meaning relative to what preceded it, seems absurd to the point of being humorous or confusing. [5] See Absurdism.

Confirmation Bias

Confirmation Bias is the strong human tendency to dismiss or distort evidence or facts that are contrary to our acceptable beliefs formed by our Mental Map and readily seek out any kind of evidence that supports our views.[6]

Begging the question

Begging the question is a type of circular reasoning, an argument that requires that the desired conclusion be considered to be true, whether it is true or not. This often occurs in an indirect way such that the fallacy’s presence is being hidden, or at least not easily apparent. Begging the question is often used to mean “raising the question” or “suggesting the question”. Sometimes it is confused with “dodging the question”, which is an evasion technique used in an attempt to avoid answering the question. [7]

Ad Hominem

An ad hominem fallacy uses personal attacks rather than logic. This fallacy occurs when someone rejects or criticizes another point of view based on the personal characteristics, ethnic background, physical appearance, or other non-relevant traits of the person who holds it.

Ad hominem arguments are often used in politics, where they are often called “mudslinging.” They are considered unethical because politicians can use them to manipulate voters’ opinions against an opponent without addressing core issues.

Bandwagon Fallacy

The Bandwagon Fallacy assumes something is true (or right or good) because others agree with it. In other words, the fallacy argues that if everyone thinks a certain way, then you should, too.

One problem with this kind of reasoning is that the broad acceptance of a claim or action doesn’t mean that it’s factually justified. People can be mistaken, confused, deceived, or even willfully irrational in their opinions, so using them to make an argument is flawed.[8]

Causal Fallacy

Causal fallacies are informal fallacies that occur when an argument incorrectly concludes that a cause is related to an effect. Think of the causal fallacy as a parent category for other fallacies about unproven causes.

One example is the false cause fallacy, which is when you draw a conclusion about what the cause was without enough evidence to do so. Another is the post hoc fallacy, which is when you mistake something for the cause because it came first — not because it actually caused the effect.

Appeal to Hypocrisy

An appeal to hypocrisy — also known as the tu quoque fallacy — focuses on the hypocrisy of an opponent. The tu quoque fallacy deflects criticism away from oneself by accusing the other person of the same problem or something comparable.

The tu quoque fallacy is an attempt to divert blame. The fallacy usually occurs when the arguer uses apparent hypocrisy to neutralize criticism and distract from the issue.

Sunk Cost

A sunk cost fallacy is when someone continues doing something because of the effort they already put in it, regardless of whether the additional costs outweigh the potential benefits. “Sunk cost” is an economic term for any past expenses that can no longer be recovered.

For example: Imagine that after watching the first six episodes of a TV show, you decide the show isn’t for you. Those six episodes are your “sunk cost.” A sunk cost fallacy would be deciding to finish watching anyway because you’ve already invested roughly six hours of your life in it.

Equivocation

Equivocation happens when a word, phrase, or sentence is used deliberately to confuse, deceive, or mislead. In other words, saying one thing but meaning another.

When it’s poetic or comical, we call this a “play on words.” But when it’s done in a political speech, an ethics debate, or an economics report — and it’s designed to make the audience think you’re saying something you’re not — that’s when it becomes a fallacy.

False Dilemma/False Dichotomy

A false dilemma or false dichotomy presents limited options — typically by focusing on two extremes — when in fact more possibilities exist. The phrase “America: Love it or leave it” is an example of a false dilemma.

The false dilemma fallacy is a manipulative tool designed to polarize the audience, promoting one side and demonizing another. It’s common in political discourse as a way of strong-arming the public into supporting controversial legislation or policies.

Hasty Generalization

A hasty generalization is a claim based on a few examples rather than substantial proof. Arguments based on hasty generalizations often don’t hold up due to a lack of supporting evidence: The claim might be true in one case, but that doesn’t mean it’s always true.

Hasty generalizations are common in arguments because there’s a wide range of what’s acceptable for “sufficient” evidence. The rules for evidence can change based on the claim you’re making and the environment where you are making it — whether it’s rooted in philosophy, the sciences, a political debate, or discussing house rules for using the kitchen.

Appeal to Authority

Appeal to authority is the misuse of an authority’s opinion to support an argument. While an authority’s opinion can represent evidence and data, it becomes a fallacy if their expertise or authority is overstated, illegitimate, or irrelevant to the topic.

For example, citing a foot doctor when trying to prove something related to psychiatry would be an appeal to authority fallacy.

Appeal to Pity

An appeal to pity relies on provoking your emotions to win an argument rather than factual evidence. Appealing to pity attempts to pull on an audience’s heartstrings, distract them, and support their point of view.

Someone accused of a crime using a cane or walker to appear more feeble in front of a jury is one example of appeal to pity. The appearance of disability isn’t an argument on the merits of the case, but it’s intended to sway the jury’s opinion anyway. [9]

References

  1. Fallacies
  2. Straw Man Fallacy
  3. Red herring
  4. Formal Fallacy
  5. Non sequitur
  6. Bio-Neurology
  7. Begging the question
  8. Fallacies
  9. Fallacies

See Also:

Doublethink

Doublespeak

Gaslighting

Weaponizing Narratives


~via Ascension Glossary


Photo #2/ caption by this blog’s editor, is not a direct representation of Lisa Renee or her source article.


LISA RENEE on “Circular Reasoning”

“Circular reasoning is when you attempt to make an argument by beginning with an assumption that what you are trying to prove is already true. In your premise, you already accept the truth of the claim you are attempting to make. Example of Circular Reasoning: ‘The Bible is true, so you should not doubt the Word of God.’ This argument rests on your prior acceptance of the Bible as truth. Therefore in the belief system and mind of this person, this is a fact that is not debatable. This is because they already believe the assumption that is stated.”

~Lisa Renee


~via Ascension Glossary


LISA RENEE: “Spiritual Bypassing”

“Spiritual Bypassing is generally an Ego Defense Mechanism used by people that identify as lightworkers or on the Ascension path, who are unwilling to see negativity or look at unpleasant truths happening around them. They consider these Unpleasant Truths to be negative energy that lowers their personal vibration, so choose to ignore them and pretend they don’t exist. They label these events or classify those people that are truth seekers that share this level of information with others, as fostering negativity and fear. As a result, they tend to be apathetic people easily manipulated by dark forces, with a weakened moral character and lower ethical standards in helping their fellow human, because their version of reality is selective or even delusional. As an example, it can be assumed that children being used as sex slaves or for Satanic Ritual Abuse have karmic reasons for being killed. Therefore, they don’t have to do anything about it, because they need to maintain their high vibration and all is in divine order.”

~Lisa Renee

 

Spiritual Bypassing is an act of denying the truth in the name of higher consciousness as per the New Age belief system, such as the refusal to help others or have Compassion for those that are suffering. As an example, this commonly happens to the victims of Satanic Ritual Abuse and Black Magicians, who are many times told by the New Age Groupthink that they brought these dark attacks on themselves because of their karma or negative behavior. This is generally explained away flippantly because the situation is considered to be negative, and that Forgiveness must be administered. Yet, people are not willing to explore the negative energy in the situation because it is believed to lower one’s vibration.

Spiritual Bypassing is generally an Ego Defense Mechanism used by people that identify as lightworkers or on the Ascension path, who are unwilling to see negativity or look at unpleasant truths happening around them. They consider these Unpleasant Truths to be negative energy that lowers their personal vibration, so choose to ignore them and pretend they don’t exist. They label these events or classify those people that are truth seekers that share this level of information with others, as fostering negativity and fear. As a result, they tend to be apathetic people easily manipulated by dark forces, with a weakened moral character and lower ethical standards in helping their fellow human, because their version of reality is selective or even delusional.

Spiritual Bypassing is an act of pure egoic selfishness in the guise of projecting oneself as an evolved and higher consciousness person. The profile of this person is that they ignore or downplay certain events they consider negative, in order to protect themselves from being mentally or emotionally triggered. As a result, they deny the truth or make convenient assumptions in order to rationalize the reasons that the tragic event has happened to another group of people. Usually, the blame is squarely placed on the victims, without any feelings of Empathy or Compassion. As an example, it can be assumed that children being used as sex slaves or for Satanic Ritual Abuse have karmic reasons for being killed. Therefore, they don’t have to do anything about it, because they need to maintain their high vibration and all is in divine order. [1]

Putting up a thought barrier and arguing against an anxiety-provoking stimuli by stating it doesn’t exist. Refusing to perceive the more unpleasant aspects of the external reality.

Splitting

Splitting is a very common Ego Defense Mechanism. It can be defined as the division or polarization of beliefs, actions, objects, or persons into good and bad by focusing selectively on their positive or negative attributes. Splitting diffuses the anxiety that arises from our inability to grasp the nuances and complexities of a given situation or state of affairs by simplifying and schematizing the situation and thereby making it easier to think about.

 

Reference:

  1. New Age, Ascension and Disclosure Hijack

See Also:

Doublespeak

Trust, Building Trust

Weaponization of the New Age

 

~via Ascension Glossary

LISA RENEE: “All or Nothing Thinking”

“All-or-nothing thinking refers to thinking in extremes. You are either a success or a failure. Something is right or it’s wrong. In order to overcome all-or-nothing thinking, it is important to avoid thinking in negative, absolute terms. Most often the narcissist does this as an attempt to stabilize their sense of self positivity in order to preserve their Self Esteem, by perceiving themselves as purely upright or admirable and others who do not conform to their will or values as purely wicked or contemptible.”

~Lisa Renee

 

Cognitive Distortions are exaggerated, obsessive or irrational thought patterns that are believed to perpetuate the effects of psychopathological states, especially depression and anxiety. When we over-rely on cognitive distortions, we usually interpret events in such a way that fuels emotions such as anxiety, depression, or anger. All-or-nothing thinking is one such distortion. All-or-nothing thinking refers to thinking in extremes. You are either a success or a failure. Something is right or it’s wrong. These are examples of all-or-nothing thinking (also known as black-and-white thinking). Thoughts and beliefs that are grounded in pessimism can negatively impact your feelings, emotions, and mental health.

In order to overcome all-or-nothing thinking, it is important to avoid thinking in negative, absolute terms. Learning how to clear Negative Ego through refocusing thoughts is suggested to help relieve Mental Anxiety and stress related to negative emotions exacerbated by negative thoughts.

Splitting 

(All-or-nothing thinking or dichotomous reasoning): 

  • Evaluating the self, as well as events in life in extreme terms.
  • It’s either all good or all bad, either black or white, nothing in between.
  • Causing every small imperfection to seem incredibly dangerous and painful.
  • Splitting involves using terms like “always”, “every” or “never” when this is neither true nor equivalent to the truth. Example: When an admired person makes a minor mistake, the admiration is turned into contempt. [1]

Narcissistic Personality Disorder

People matching the diagnostic criteria for narcissistic personality disorder also use splitting as a central Ego Defense Mechanism. Most often the narcissist does this as an attempt to stabilize their sense of self positivity in order to preserve their Self Esteem, by perceiving themselves as purely upright or admirable and others who do not conform to their will or values as purely wicked or contemptible. Given the narcissist’s perverse sense of entitlement and Splitting, he or she can be equally geared, psychologically and practically, towards the promotion of projects, simultaneously promoting the demise of a certain collectively beneficial project.

The cognitive habit of splitting also implies the use of other related Ego Defense Mechanisms, namely idealization and devaluation, which are preventative attitudes or reactions to Narcissistic Rage and narcissistic injury.

 

See Also:

Negative Ego

Ego Defense Mechanism

Splitting

 

~via Ascension Glossary

LISA RENEE (Time Shift Blog): “Exploitation of Uncleared Trauma”

“As the steward of this website, this psychological warfare tactic to discredit my body of work happens quite often, and recently these attempts are only increasing, due to the many controversial themes and unapproved topics I have been willing to discuss publicly. At this time, I am the target of a character assassination campaign, as well as an attempt to prevent my newsletters and blogs from reaching an larger audience through shadow banning. Most that do understand psychological warfare know that those people that threaten the Controllers or NAA the most, tend to be the targets of an assortment of divide and conquer tactics, as well as projected upon with an assortment of victimizer archetypes. The collective victimizer archetypes are being pushed very hard into the minds of the mentally and emotionally confused, to get unstable and ignorant people to attack others through a delusional narrative that has been made up by the negative ego and pain body in order to relieve their inner anxiety.”

~Lisa Renee

 

Dear Ascending Family,

Since May, there has been an ongoing sequence of accelerated plasma wave activations into the planetary body that generate strong alchemical shifts in the overall fundamental state of one’s consciousness, self-awareness and perception. The energetic acceleration has been intense and has been impacting some people with unhealed trauma to tip over into dire states of mental confusion and emotional body imbalances. When a person does not recognize mental and emotional imbalances that are the result of their own unhealed pain, trauma and fear, they can become completely controlled by these dark forces, unaware they are being manipulated by their own inner shadows. Mental and emotional pain when not addressed with unconditional love, kindness and self-acceptance, can erupt into a variety of ego defense mechanisms, in which that person uses the outer reality to blame other people or make up situations for the pain they have felt or for what they are enduring. The blame game is used by the negative ego in order to shift responsibility onto others that are convenient targets for projection. This is commonly perpetuated by a person that makes up a reality that is completely imagined in order to justify the actions of their negative ego. Many spiritual catalysts and awakening people are commonly projected upon in this way by those who remain asleep or controlled in strict mental dogma.

What I am observing is an acceleration of unstable people making up realities to suit their belief systems based on their unhealed pain. It is very disturbing to notice an acceleration of delusions and deceptions being paraded around as absolute truths from the most mentally and emotionally fractured people within the masses.

Projections of made up events about other people are a way to use character assassination to spread malicious gossip about the targeted person in order to ruin their social reputation. Unstable people are easily manipulated to repeat the lies they have been told, acting as the carrier wave to spread malicious gossip. As the steward of this website, this psychological warfare tactic to discredit my body of work happens quite often, and recently these attempts are only increasing, due to the many controversial themes and unapproved topics I have been willing to discuss publicly. At this time, I am the target of a character assassination campaign, as well as an attempt to prevent my newsletters and blogs from reaching an larger audience through shadow banning. Most that do understand psychological warfare know that those people that threaten the Controllers or NAA the most, tend to be the targets of an assortment of divide and conquer tactics, as well as projected upon with an assortment of victimizer archetypes. The collective victimizer archetypes are being pushed very hard into the minds of the mentally and emotionally confused, to get unstable and ignorant people to attack others through a delusional narrative that has been made up by the negative ego and pain body in order to relieve their inner anxiety. The negative ego likes to play hero-savior and imagine that they can be the hero that saves the people of earth from uncertain doom, that they alone have absolute truth and no one else knows this truth but them.

This is the result of individuals who are not only mentally confused, but subconsciously requiring an external person to act like a whipping post or hold an enemy patterning, in order to justify their choices and the negative direction they are moving towards. People that are stuck in mentally rigid or polarized thinking, tend to not be able to perceive the larger global picture of events. Instead they take a myopic perspective of insignificant details, and with this sliver of information, place judgments upon it without the use of common sense or critical thinking. This Archontic strategy is to keep the masses ruminating and obsessing on insignificant and trivial matters, where the individual cannot see the forest through the trees. This myopic view influences people to make life decisions based on a miniscule amount of twisted information and poor discernment. Sadly, the negative ego tends to feel better about itself and believe it is gaining more power, when it engages in the act of putting other people down. By accusing targeted people of things they did not do in so to justify their own actions. The dark forces have a rule written in their doctrine, “accuse others of what you have done and always deny what you are accused of”. This is the primary motto of many cabal members and many traumatized people act out this same adage, unconsciously.

When you notice a person with an pushy agenda to inform others about unsavory details they claim to have about another person, use critical thinking and common sense. What is the true motivation behind spreading negative information about someone else? Until a person has reached a stable and coherent level of maintaining observer consciousness, many will have a hard time trying to figure out the energetic signature of outright lies and those people doing the best they can to tell the truth. Always, it is important to tell the truth as you know it, and to not use other people as excuses for spreading lies. The war over consciousness is continuing to accelerate, and many people are tipping over into the abyss of deception and lies that they tell themselves. As truth seekers, we must be able to navigate the maze of lies and act with the highest personal integrity by always telling the truth in the most harmless and kind way possible.

People that are mentally confused and feeling pain or desperation, tend to look for something or someone to pin on their personal issues, because it is easier in the short term to get relief from inner anxiety if you tell yourself the pain you are in is because of something else outside of you. It takes a lot of bravery and courage to look at the pain created inside your mind and body, and be willing to take responsibility for it in so to be able to take productive steps to heal that pain. In the death culture, the negative ego is constantly reinforced by the mind control programming to give away personal power to something that exists outside of ourselves. The Controllers have carefully cultivated a fear based reality in which many people are not willing to be fully responsible for the direction of their own personal energies and thoughts. Where we place our focus and attention is what generates energy in our personal reality and that content ripples out into the environment. If we live and act in fear based thinking, we will only create much more fear in our minds, emotions and body, this grows the inner shadows. We stand at a difficult precipice in finding a way to bring energetic balance between making an accurate assessment of what we are actually being exposed to in the outer world by desperate dark forces that seek to gain control over our every move, versus the requirement to reclaim our personal power by assigning our authority not to the negative ego fears, but to the highest expression of our spiritual being, our direct relationship with God. God and Soul is loving and kind, allowing others to be who they are authentically without recrimination.

Psychological warfare tool

It is helpful to understand that dark forces in humans and nonhumans, commonly use blame shifting as a psychological warfare tool to weaken and exploit spiritually awakening people. Blame shifting is a potent way to use trauma based mind control to weaken people, and so controller and manipulator types use this tactic skillfully to exploit those around them. Blame shifting can also be accompanied with Gaslighting. We must remember the goal of dark forces is to exploit and weaken those spiritually activated. Thus they will target the mental body, emotional body and spiritual body, in so to exploit personal weaknesses. The plan of action is to make that person doubt themselves or second guess what actually happened to them, even if they remember what has happened very clearly. When a person is in perpetual self-doubt, this greatly weakens his or her mind and spiritual communication. Gaslighting is a form of psychological-emotional abuse that Controlling types of personalities and dark forces use to which a victim is manipulated into doubting and discrediting their own memories, perceptions, experiences and sanity. When people do not have the whole picture of events, and they are being deceived and manipulated with only limited access to the truth contained in circumstances, it obfuscates their ability to make informed, clear and well thought out decisions. Thus human and non-human Gaslighters like to tell other people what they are feeling, what they are perceiving, what they should be doing, and criticize and condemn anything else they do not agree with in that persons experience, because it is not favorable to serve their own selfish agendas. By attempting to gain total control over another person, this directly leads to control over the mind of another person, and this is what dark forces are striving for. As long as they have some influence or control over the mind, they continue to have control in the mind, body and spirit of that individual.

As we learn how to refocus our thoughts, we can prevent overwhelming states of emotion from triggering impulsive behaviors and angry reactions, expressed as Splitting Behaviors. As we develop strong impulse control, we are learning a form of ego discipline through applied patience and diligence. If we check in and find that we do not like what we are feeling, we can better understand the reasons for that, by further shifting into the observer mode. We call the process of shifting from identifying with a thought or feeling, into neutrally observing it, the observer mode. This requires moving ourselves into the compassionate witness. As a Compassionate Witness we have no judgment of thoughts or feelings, we hold no judgment of what we are observing in the external, we only observe those thoughts and feelings in our self and others. When we can fully observe through our own Compassionate Witness, we then have the possibility of becoming neutral and centered. Then, we can find relief from our inner anxiety, fears and a host of other thought distortions. This process is key to shifting ego defense mechanisms, thought addiction tendencies, and releasing the anxiety or fear of feeling the emotional depth or pain that contributes to Splitting Behaviors. By continually using an Ego Defense Mechanism to avoid facing the source causation of the anxiety or deeply rooted fear, (which is unresolved pain or trauma) we are only perpetuating the mental looping, which uses denial of the truth in order to avoid feeling pain or discomfort. Denial of accurate accounts of the truth is the seed of all ego defense mechanisms that stunt our continuing path of emotional and spiritual development.

This planet is ascending into the higher frequencies of plasma, which greatly impact the principles of energetic coherence around us. Coherence is a necessary energetic principle to understand on the Ascension path as we progress towards personal consciousness expansion. Coherence is the main principle used to describe the synchronistic harmonizing of energetic properties that occur naturally within any living system, to support the integration of that grouping of energy. When an individual lives in unhealed emotional pain and mental confusion, this greatly decreases their state of energetic coherence, and as a result, when large energy activations enter the planetary body, they tend to tip over easily into extreme imbalances. When we dismantle the old enslavement profiles from this reptilian based Controller society, each of us must make the effort to explore new models of spiritually beneficial behavior, focusing on those humanitarian traits that support individual and collective growth to help evolve spiritual advancement. As we undergo successive levels of bifurcation, this is the point where the decision framework comes in for each person. People make decisions based upon the kind of motivations, thoughts, and actions they have as general thoughtforms influencing their lifestyle. Many of us are observing these patterns of bifurcation, or splitting apart, and the synchronization of the energy fields based on personal resonances that either create increased coherence, or lack of coherence. This occurs during the Ascension Cycle, and impacts everyone and everything. The state of being coherent is formed by unifying the sum of the parts to be united, so they form a synthesized whole. Coherence directly corresponds to the process of leaving behind individualistic expressions of ego, while moving towards expressing group consciousness or unity consciousness, which is the opposite of the negative ego in action.

Please be kind to yourself and others, may peace reign true inside your heart, mind and body.

With Love and GSF,

Lisa

 

~via EnergeticSynthesis.com – Time Shift Blog – posted July 9, 2019