TIMOTHY FITZPATRICK: “We TOLD You Trump Was Sexually Compromised”

When Mike Pompeo said COVID was a “simulation”, Trump said, “I wish someone had told me.” His role was to pretend to be the ‘good cop’ while giving the store to his fellow Satanists. Thus he failed to ensure the integrity of the 2020 election. In 2017, we wrote:

“Trump’s job is not to lead us to the Promised Land. His job is to polarize and divide.  They are all Freemasons: Trump, Hillary, Putin, May, Merkel, George Soros, Netanyahu etc. Most members of Congress are. Stalin, Hitler, FDR and Churchill were.  The goal is conflict itself – gridlock, war, and chaos. Ordo ab Chao. 

They are transforming the world. War and mayhem are how they do it.  

Freemasons have divided into Communist and Zionist house teams. Freemasons and Illuminati Jews are on BOTH sides of every conflict.  (See also- Profumo Affair Exposed Masonic Conspiracy

SEX

In case Trump insisted on the true election result, there was sexual blackmail to keep him in check.  Blackmail is a price of admission to the Illuminati. Trump was false opposition.

If Patriots look to him for leadership, they are doomed. 

(Trump admits he is a Freemason at 3 min) 

Update – It’s all a Charade: Soros and Trump are Business Partners 

by Timothy Fitzpatrick

Trump Controlled by Mossad

(Excerpts by henrymakow.com) 

Every person in a position of power should be suspected of being controlled through [sexual] blackmail since the Judeo-masonic cryptocracy controls virtually every aspect of organized government, the press, and the financial system, to name a few. You may have heard of the bizarre sexual initiation of Yale University’s Skull and Bones secret society, where the would-be Bonesman reveals his sexual secrets to his fellow initiates and initiators. From the very start of their societal ascent, you could say, a Bonesman is blackmailed and falls under the control of the society.

This scenario is played out in virtually every sphere of influence at one degree (pun intended) or another. As it happens, both presidential candidates are connected to sexual scandals, the likes of which we shall explore in Trump’s life.

“KATIE JOHNSON”, TRUMP’S LARRY SINCLAIR ?

On April 26, 2016, a “Katie Johnson” filed a rape complaint in a California Court against defendants Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein. The complaint was dismissed by a judge due to a lack of plaintiff address, not due to any frivolity of the complaint. Trump supporters were quick to dismiss the charge, however, the lack of address on behalf of the plaintiff could have been due to fear for her life.

(Katie Johnson, right, as a teen) 

“On the fourth and final sexual encounter with the Defendant, Donald J. Trump, the Plaintiff, Katie Johnson, was tied to a bed by Defendant Trump who then proceeded to forcibly rape Plaintiff Johnson. During the course of this savage sexual attack, Plaintiff Johnson loudly pleaded with Defendant Trump to ‘please wear a condom’. Defendant Trump responded by violently striking Plaintiff Johnson in the face with his open hand and screaming that he would do whatever he wanted as he refused to wear protection. After achieving sexual orgasm, the Defendant, Donald J. Trump put his suit back on and when the Plaintiff, Katie Johnson, in tears asked Defendant Trump what would happen if he had impregnated her, Defendant Trump grabbed his wallet and threw some money at her and screamed that she should use the money to “get a f*cking abortion.”

Incidentally, Trump has flip-flopped on his abortion stance. Of course, how could Trump ever ban abortion? What would 13-year-old rape victims do then?

New Jersey lawyer Thomas Francis Meagher revised Johnson’s case and filed it in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.

“Plaintiff was subject to acts of rape, sexual misconduct, criminal sexual acts, sexual abuse, forcible touching, assault, battery, intentional and reckless infliction of emotional distress, duress, false imprisonment, and threats of death and/or serious bodily injury by the Defendants that took place at several parties during the summer months of 1994. The parties were held by Defendant Epstein at a New York City residence that was being used by Defendant Epstein at 9 E. 71st St. in Manhattan [known as the Wexler Mansion]. During this period, Plaintiff was a minor of age 13.”

An alleged witness, Tiffany Doe, to the above rape has come forward. She claims she was paid by [Jeffrey] Epstein to lure underage girls to Epstein-and-friends parties with the bait of promised modeling opportunities.

“It was at these series of parties that I personally witness the Plaintiff being forced to perform various sexual acts with Donald J. Trump and Mr. Epstein. Both Mr. Trump and Mr. Epstein were advised that she was 13 years old.”

Tiffany Doe goes on in her affidavit to identify a 12-year-old victim of Trump and Epstein as well as to witness Epstein making death threats to the girls should they reveal the abuse. A second witness to the original Jane Doe (previous pseudonym Katie Johnson) corroborates the story of both Johnson and her lurer. The case remains open.

Yet another corroborating detail of Trump’s alleged sexual history includes his own wife–at the time, Ivana–accusing him of raping her in 1989. Perhaps convenient for Trump, Ivana somewhat recanted this accusation in July, 2015, just in time for the presidential race.

DAUGHTERS 

Publicly, Trump has made some disturbing, incestuous comments about his own daughters, at one time discussing the potential breast size of his then-infant daughter Tiffany and also claiming that he would be dating daughter Ivanka had he not been her father. Normally when you hear someone talking about legs and breasts, it’s not a parent talking about their infant daughter. Trump thinks this way because that is what must always be on his mind, regardless of age and regardless of kin. Almost every time he publicly talks of Ivanka he can’t help but compliment her body.

 

One cannot rule out the possibility that Ivanka is the victim of sexual abuse and mind control, although there is nothing directly suggesting this (the CIA’s MK-Ultra program is alleged to have prostituted to children, sometimes with the help of the children’s own parents, to politicians and persons of power). Trump’s posed photo with then 15-year-old Ivanka, where she is wearing a short skirt and slinky top without a bra whilst perched atop copulating birds, doesn’t help Trump’s avoidance of incest suspicion or MKUltra abuse. Interestingly, Ivanka’s slinky top is covered with butterflies, symbolic of beta kitten programming. Ivanka’s personal contact information was found in Epstein’s black book.

A video recently surfaced showing Donald Trump telling a pre-teen girl that he would be dating her in ten years–just one more piece of evidence that Trump is a sexual predator[xix]. In 2003, Trump went on the Howard Stern show and talked about how hot Paris Hilton was when she was 12.

“I’ve known Paris Hilton from the time she’s 12, her parents are friends of mine, and the first time I saw her she walked into the room and I said, “Who the hell is that?’ Well, at 12, I wasn’t interested,” Trump said. “I’ve never been into that… but she was beautiful.”

Trump told Stern in that same interview that he had watched Hilton’s sex tape. Big surprise there. What we basically have here is the American version of Jimmy Savile in Donald Trump!

CHARGES WITHDRAWN

A week before the U.S. federal election, Katie Johnson, the woman who filed a lawsuit alleging that Donald Trump raped her when she was 13 at an Epstein sex party in New York, cancelled a press conference, at which she was to reveal her identity (the conference would precede the approaching pre-trial in December of this year). On November 2, Johnson’s legal representative, Los Angeles civil rights attorney Lisa Bloom, told a press scrum at her Woodland Hills, Los Angeles offices that Johnson would not be appearing due to fear of her life following threats:

“I have bad news. Jane Doe has received numerous threats today as have all the Trump accusers that I have represented.”

Then, only three days before the election, Johnson withdrew her lawsuit against the would-be President of the United States and his longtime friend Jewish billionaire and convicted child sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein, who raped Johnson and other young girls while having them play out role-playing fantasies.

That the dropping of the suit was a huge convenience for Trump and his eventual election goes without saying. Johnson’s deposition stated that Trump and Epstein threatened her life and those of the other child victims if they were to reveal the crime. It appears that, with this decades’ old threat, they finally got to Johnson and her lawyer in time for the election.

The mainstream media was mysteriously silent on the Johnson lawsuit, with the Daily Mail being the main conduit to disseminate information to the public regarding the case. The Daily Mail’s last article on the Johnson-Trump rape scandal was published on Nov. 7, 2016, the eve of the election, with the deceptive headline of “EXCLUSIVE: Troubled woman with a history of drug use who claimed that she was assaulted by Donald Trump at a Jeffrey Epstein sex party at age 13 MADE IT ALL UP”.[xi] 

Notice that the writer of the article headline used all uppercase letters for the lie they told. The article never conclusively proves that she made up her story. Nowhere does Johnson say she made anything up, yet the Daily Mail crafted this politically-motivated, click-baiting headline to suggest otherwise. The Mail also slanted the story to suggest that Johnson’s claims were that of a drug-riddled, troubled person. If this is true, it is not an uncommon result for rape victims. 

(Trump with child-sex procurer Ghislaine Maxwell)

In truth, the Daily Mail was counting on people reading only the dismissive headline rather than reading the article and weighing the evidence and deciding for themselves. … Furthermore, the Daily Mail itself spoke with Epstein procurer “Tiffany” who corroborated Johnson’s entire story, which just happens to corroborate Virginia Roberts proven claims against Epstein. It seems the Daily Mail was given a last-minute directive (by Mossad?) to exonerate Trump, thus the Mail’s sudden and unsubstantiated dismissal of Johnson’s claims. Ironically, child-sex procurer Ghislaine Maxwell’s Mossad-asset father Robert Maxwell controlled much of Britain’s media at one time. It’s likely that Britain’s media, today, is still in similar hands, thus the dramatic U-turn by the Daily Mail in the Johnson case.

Adding to the disinformation surrounding this case is the double standard held by Trump supporters and the pseudo-alternative media. Rape allegations–all of them–against Bill and Hillary Clinton are fair game but any against Trump are off limits.

Related- Netanyahu an Example for Trump?

———– Seven Things You Ought to Know about Trump and Sex Slave Island 

———— Have Americans Been NeoConned?

~via Henry Makow

BOMBSHELL EXCLUSIVE!!! ~ “Epstein Victim Maria Farmer Speaks With Whitney Webb — Full Phone Call — Part 2”

 

 

~via The Last American Vagabond

‘MUST WATCH’!!! ~ Jason Bermas: “Maria Farmer Drops Epstein ‘Truth Bombs’ Live!”

 

 

~via Jason Bermas

DERRICK BROZE: “Appeals Court Refuses to Overturn Jeffrey Epstein’s ‘Sweetheart Deal'”

“In 2015, U.S. District Judge Kenneth Marra sided with the U.S. Attorney’s Office and Epstein in asserting that 15,000 pages of documents must remain private. The women behind the suit state they believe Epstein’s connections helped him get his ‘sweetheart’ prison deal. The fact that U.S. Circuit Judge Kevin Newsom was appointed by Donald Trump should not be ignored. Trump was an associate of Epstein throughout the 1990’s and the 2000’s. And after becoming President, Donald Trump appointed Alexander Acosta to U.S. Labor Secretary. Acosta is the same attorney who helped seal Epstein’s non-prosecution agreement. When Acosta was questioned during his nomination hearing regarding his role in Epstein’s deal, he downplayed the collusion and claimed that there might not be enough evidence to convict Epstein.”

~Derrick Broze

 

On Tuesday, a 2-1 majority rejected an appeal from one of the victims of disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein which would have thrown out a non-prosecution agreement that provided immunity to Epstein, his aides, and unnamed “co-conspirators.”

Epstein’s escapades became front page news in the summer of 2019 when he was arrested and faced charges for abusing dozens of young girls at his homes in Florida, New Mexico, New York, and Paris. Epstein died of an alleged suicide on August 2019 while in custody on new sex-crime charges filed in New York.

The latest attempt to overturn Epstein’s arrangement with Florida prosecutors was filed by Courtney Wild, who says she was sexually abused by Epstein at his Palm Beach mansion at the age of 14. ​​​The 11th Circuit Court of Appeals rejected Wild’s appeal, stating that despite the government’s attempts at shielding Epstein from harm, the Crime Victims’ Right Act (CVRA) does not allow for relief for victims who are mistreated by prosecutors prior to a formal charge being filed.

Courthouse News reports:

“Claiming rampant violations of the Crime Victims Rights Act, women abused by Epstein in their youth have been fighting in court since 2008 to overturn his and his aides’ federal immunity, to obtain grand jury records and hold Florida public hearings where they can air their grievances against the Justice Department. Despite our sympathy for Ms. Wild and others like her, who suffered unspeakable horror at Epstein’s hands, only to be left in the dark—and, so it seems, affirmatively misled—by government lawyers, we find ourselves constrained to deny her petition,” U.S. Circuit Judge Kevin Newsom, an appointee of President Donald Trump, wrote for the majority.

After the decision, Courtney Wild stated, “The government intentionally misled the victims but found a way to get away with it by working with a child molester to get around the law. The judges ruled in their favor. How?”

The two judges who ruled against Wild claimed that overturning the original non-prosecution agreement could potentially infringe on prosecutors and law enforcement officials decision making process if they feel their decisions may be later overturned. Senior U.S. Circuit Judge Frank Hull, the one dissenting vote, said the other judges decisions ignores the terms of the CVRA. “The majority’s contorted statutory interpretation materially revises the statute’s plain text and guts victims’ rights under the CVRA. Nothing, and I mean nothing, in the CVRA’s plain text requires the majority’s result,” she wrote. ​​

Wild’s attorney Paul Cassell told Courthouse News that it’s “clear that the Act as written by Congress can apply even before an indictment is filed.”​​ Cassell said that Wild plans to file for an en banc rehearing before the full 11th Circuit. ​​If that rehearing is rejected, the claim could eventually make its way to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Despite rejecting Wild’s appeal, the judges acknowledged that, “mysteries still exist about how Epstein and his co-conspirators escaped federal prosecution for multiple sex-trafficking crimes against over 30 minor girls in Florida.”

A History of Cover Ups

This is not the first time the controversial plea deal has been discussed in court. In 2008, following Epstein’s plea agreement, attorney Bradley Edwards filed suit against the U.S. government claiming the feds failed to involve the victims in the settlement, an obligation required by the Crime Victims’ Rights Act. Edwards was one of the lawyers representing the women who brought the original suit against Epstein.

In 2015, U.S. District Judge Kenneth Marra sided with the U.S. Attorney’s Office and Epstein in asserting that 15,000 pages of documents must remain private. The women behind the suit state they believe Epstein’s connections helped him get his ‘sweetheart’ prison deal.

The fact that U.S. Circuit Judge Kevin Newsom was appointed by Donald Trump should not be ignored. Trump was an associate of Epstein throughout the 1990’s and the 2000’s. And after becoming President, Donald Trump appointed Alexander Acosta to U.S. Labor Secretary. Acosta is the same attorney who helped seal Epstein’s non-prosecution agreement.

In the spring of 2017, Acosta, who was at that time serving as the Miami U.S. Attorney, was nominated by Donald Trump and approved by the U.S. Congress. When Acosta was questioned during his nomination hearing regarding his role in Epstein’s deal, he downplayed the collusion and claimed that there might not be enough evidence to convict Epstein.

Whether he was a willing participant or strong armed into the agreement, Acosta helped Epstein reach a plea deal that allowed him to get away with the victimization of dozens of young girls.

In 2015 Politico reported that court documents released through litigation appeared to show prosecutors cooperating with Epstein’s lawyers to keep the deal secret. Assistant U.S. Attorney Marie Villafaña used her personal Gmail account to suggest to one of Epstein’s lawyers that they file legal papers in a different jurisdiction as a way to “hopefully cut the press coverage significantly.” Villafaña told Epstein’s attorney that she would “include our standard language regarding resolving all criminal liability and I will mention ‘co-conspirators,’ but I would prefer not to highlight for the judge all of the other crimes and all of the other persons that we could charge.”

Edwards and Paul Cassell filed a court document in response to the revelations, stating that “the victims’ allegations of a conspiracy between the Government and Epstein’s attorneys to conceal the existence of a broad non-prosecution agreement are not mere speculation, but appear to be well supported.” The suspicion of improper deal-making is one of the key reasons these women and Bradley Edwards have fought for this lawsuit for the last 12 years.

The closing of yet another case against Epstein and his co-conspirators will likely continue to fuel theories that Epstein was working for an as yet unnamed intelligence agency.

 

 

~via TheMindUnleashed.com

‘MUST WATCH’!!! ~ “Exposing the Epstein-Wexner-Trump-Clinton-Gates Mafia” — With Derrick Broze & Whitney Webb

Derrick Broze interviews journalist Whitney Webb about her work investigating Jeffrey Epstein, and the network behind him.

 

Whitney Webb’s MintPress News Epstein articles:

https://www.mintpressnews.com/?s=Whitney+webb

Whitney Webb’s Last American Vagabond articles: 

https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/category/whitney-webb/

Support Whitney: https://www.patreon.com/whitneywebbmpn

Support our work AND get a free ounce of Kratom to help with fatigue, stress, addiction, and pain: http://broze.freeounceofkratom.com

Please help us advance truth, healing, community building, and empowering the people to wake up and build a better world:
https://www.Patreon.com/DerrickBroze

https://paypal.me/consciousresistance

Support via crypto:

https://bitbacker.io/user/dbroze/#pro…

https://www.subscribestar.com/derrick…

The Conscious Resistance Network can be found here:

https://www.theconsciousresistance.com
https://www.bitchute.com/theconscious…
https://flote.app/ConsciousResistance
https://www.Minds.com/TheConsciousRes…
https://hive.blog/@dbroze
Discord channel: https://discord.gg/tQrNTYS
Join our text list for direct updates: https://www.remind.com/join/dbjourno3
Join Derrick Broze’s Daily News on Telegram: https://t.me/dbrozenews

The Conscious Resistance Network is an independent media organization focused on empowering individuals through education, philosophy, health, and community organizing. We work to create a world where corporate and state power does not rule over the lives of free human beings.
Category
Nonprofits & Activism
License
Creative Commons Attribution license (reuse allowed)

 

 

~via The Conscious Resistance